0 users browsing Emulation. | 1 bot
Pages: 1
| daman |
Posted on 21-08-28, 17:24 (revision 1)
|
 Post: #16 of 19 Since: 05-10-21 Last post: 1149 days Last view: 1137 days |
Hi, please make a version of 'bsnes 0.70' with a support for 'tristar super 8' to play NES games on bsnes. Or make a 'tristar super 8' update for 'bsnes 0.70'. Thanks, |
| CaptainJistuce |
Posted on 21-08-28, 20:01
|
|
Custom title here
 Post: #1022 of 1164 Since: 10-30-18 Last post: 73 days Last view: 22 hours |
No. --- In UTF-16, where available. --- |
| Kawaoneechan |
Posted on 21-08-28, 20:14
|
|
Ambidextrous Sprite
 Post: #566 of 599 Since: 10-29-18 Last post: 205 days Last view: 14 hours |
No. |
| CaptainJistuce |
Posted on 21-08-28, 22:47
|
|
Custom title here
Post: #1023 of 1164 Since: 10-30-18 Last post: 73 days Last view: 22 hours |
Posted by Kawaquoted for truth --- In UTF-16, where available. --- |
| daman |
Posted on 21-08-29, 15:42
|
|
Post: #17 of 19 Since: 05-10-21 Last post: 1149 days Last view: 1137 days |
Oh. |
| tomman |
Posted on 21-08-30, 03:03
|
|
Dinosaur
 Post: #990 of 1318 Since: 10-30-18 Last post: 6 days Last view: 18 hours |
Why would you even want to emulate a broken, buggy NES-on-a-chip™ "adapter" when you have far better emulators available for your personal computer? Even if we look it from a preservation aspect... there is not much to preserve here: the Tristar completely sidesteps the SNES audio/video subsystems, and it only uses the SNES hardware for input (there is a ROM, of course... which does little else than polling pad input, and that's it). So yeah, I vote for NO. Licensed Pirate® since 2006, 100% Buttcoin™-free, enemy of All Things JavaScript™ |
| CaptainJistuce |
Posted on 21-08-30, 03:58
|
|
Custom title here
Post: #1024 of 1164 Since: 10-30-18 Last post: 73 days Last view: 22 hours |
Posted by tomman Also, if added for some strange reason, it wouldn't be to a decade-old version of bsnes, it'd be to the current development tree. --- In UTF-16, where available. --- |
| daman |
Posted on 21-09-19, 20:12
|
|
Post: #18 of 19 Since: 05-10-21 Last post: 1149 days Last view: 1137 days |
There's excellent Super game boy emulation on 0.70, why not to add Tristar super 8. I want to play games on super 8. |
| CaptainJistuce |
Posted on 21-09-19, 21:18
|
|
Custom title here
Post: #1025 of 1164 Since: 10-30-18 Last post: 73 days Last view: 22 hours |
Because 0.70 is a specific release, not a development branch. New development after that release would go into 0.71. But that's also in the past, so new development would go into .116. --- In UTF-16, where available. --- |
| tomman |
Posted on 21-09-20, 01:15
|
|
Dinosaur
Post: #997 of 1318 Since: 10-30-18 Last post: 6 days Last view: 18 hours |
Posted by daman Because the Super 8 is a knockoff NES!!!! Get a NES emulator, end of story. Licensed Pirate® since 2006, 100% Buttcoin™-free, enemy of All Things JavaScript™ |
| daman |
Posted on 21-10-08, 19:31
|
|
Post: #19 of 19 Since: 05-10-21 Last post: 1149 days Last view: 1137 days |
I can't wait for 116. |
| Kawaoneechan |
Posted on 21-10-08, 21:27
|
|
Not Richard Pryor
Post: #567 of 599 Since: 10-29-18 Last post: 205 days Last view: 14 hours |
Posted by daman I've some bad news for you. Posted by hunterk There is nothing to do about bsnes that would warrant a v116 release. It's basically finished at 115, barring weird compatibility stuff that might come up in, for example, Windows 11. |
Pages: 1
[Your ad here? Why not!]