0 users browsing Emulation. | 1 guest | 2 bots
| daman |
Posted on 21-05-17, 04:34 (revision 2)
|
 Post: #5 of 19 Since: 05-10-21 Last post: 1146 days Last view: 1134 days |
Hi, I'm looking for bsnes emulator for Windows 98 SE. which is the last version of bsnes for Windows 98 SE and where I can download it (post download link - including the source code)? Thanks, |
| Screwtape |
Posted on 21-05-17, 05:56
|
|
Full mod
 Post: #434 of 443 Since: 10-30-18 Last post: 1108 days Last view: 179 days |
The first version of bsnes was released in 2004, so it would have been designed for Windows XP. Maybe it worked on Windows 98, but if it did, it would have been by accident. I'm not sure there's ever been a version of bsnes that worked on Win98. The ending of the words is ALMSIVI. |
| daman |
Posted on 21-05-17, 07:28 (revision 4)
|
|
Post: #6 of 19 Since: 05-10-21 Last post: 1146 days Last view: 1134 days |
Which is the exact version (numbers)? Also which is the first version that has excellent 'Super game boy' and 'Super game boy 2' emulation? Can you make a bsnes 0.70 build for Win 98 SE please? |
| creaothceann |
Posted on 21-05-17, 08:47
|
 Post: #335 of 456 Since: 10-29-18 Last post: 51 days Last view: 2 hours |
Why? My current setup: Super Famicom ("2/1/3" SNS-CPU-1CHIP-02) → SCART → OSSC → StarTech USB3HDCAP → AmaRecTV 3.10 |
| daman |
Posted on 21-05-17, 16:51
|
|
Post: #7 of 19 Since: 05-10-21 Last post: 1146 days Last view: 1134 days |
So I can use on older PC with Win 98 (and other users too). |
| creaothceann |
Posted on 21-05-17, 17:47
|
|
Post: #336 of 456 Since: 10-29-18 Last post: 51 days Last view: 2 hours |
A PC old enough to require Windows 95 would not be fast enough for bsnes either. My current setup: Super Famicom ("2/1/3" SNS-CPU-1CHIP-02) → SCART → OSSC → StarTech USB3HDCAP → AmaRecTV 3.10 |
| daman |
Posted on 21-05-17, 18:23 (revision 5)
|
|
Post: #8 of 19 Since: 05-10-21 Last post: 1146 days Last view: 1134 days |
Why not? Celeron 2.93GHz, Geforce 128mbram, 512 ddr 1, 250GB IDE HDD, DVD-RW. I had problems with bsnes 0.70 on that PC with XP though; sound and screen - 'skips'. Previously as I've been examining such things (like benchmarking), on older PC's as such, Win 9x is -at least- twice as faster on games and other things than XP on the same PC. ... the main thing that worries me is that I don't have a proper 'Super game boy' and 'Super game boy 2' on Win 9x on that PC. I'm not sure if SameBoy 0.8 emulator would work on Win 9x as it's been released in 2017. But I don't have a proper replacement for Win 9x (and I'm not sure if there's a proper replacement also for BeOS 5 - as I've wrote in other post). https://sameboy.github.io/posts/release-0.8 |
| funkyass |
Posted on 21-05-17, 21:09
|
|
Post: #194 of 202
Since: 11-01-18 Last post: 667 days Last view: 22 days |
you might, might get better results running linux. bsnes\higan really benefits from having more than one core however. |
| CaptainJistuce |
Posted on 21-05-17, 23:36 (revision 1)
|
|
Custom title here
 Post: #998 of 1164 Since: 10-30-18 Last post: 70 days Last view: 7 hours |
Bsnes is not the emu you're looking for. No version of it runs on Windows 98, and while it isn't Crysis-meme levels of power hungry, it really requires more computational might than anything that uses DDR1 can provide. (You don't say WHICH Celeron, but the RAM type narrows it down enough. I'm betting Pentium4-based.) --- In UTF-16, where available. --- |
| funkyass |
Posted on 21-05-18, 05:12 (revision 1)
|
|
Post: #195 of 202
Since: 11-01-18 Last post: 667 days Last view: 22 days |
its is the single core, single threaded Celeron D 340/341 |
| daman |
Posted on 21-05-18, 07:10 (revision 1)
|
|
Post: #9 of 19 Since: 05-10-21 Last post: 1146 days Last view: 1134 days |
Hmmm... for 'Super nintendo' emulation I can find other excellent alternative (like zsnes), but for 'Super game boy' and 'Super game boy 2' I couldn't (other than bsnes or Sameboy). SGB and SGB2 are other parts of 'Super nintendo' to be complete. Btw Sameboy 0.8 doesn't works on Win 98. |
| CaptainJistuce |
Posted on 21-05-18, 12:08
|
|
Custom title here
Post: #1000 of 1164 Since: 10-30-18 Last post: 70 days Last view: 7 hours |
You're outta luck. Many Gameboy emulators offer a minimal SGB experience(they'll successfully acquire borders, and sometimes colors). But bsnes and higan are the only emus I know of to ever fully emulate the Super Nintendo/GameBoy marriage. And they won't work on Windows 98, or at an acceptable speed under any OS on the system you're targeting. ... ESPECIALLY not while running Super GameBoy emulation, which is much like running a GameBoy emulator and a Super Nintendo emulator at the same time, only slower because they have to stop to talk to each other frequently. --- In UTF-16, where available. --- |
| tomman |
Posted on 21-05-18, 14:04 (revision 1)
|
|
Dinosaur
 Post: #945 of 1318 Since: 10-30-18 Last post: 3 days Last view: 2 hours |
For a retrobox, stick to retrosoftware. While you could run Linux on that Prescott-based Celeron (which is not a good pick for performance-oriented emulators), you will run very tight on the RAM side (even lightweight distros aren't that great nowadays due mostly to software bloat everywhere), and bsnes most likely will run like crap there. And I say this as a guy that still keeps an ol' Northwood for once-in-a-while Genesis emulation (but using an emulator suitable for toasters, like PicoDrive or Kega Fusion, not the good stuff like BlastEm) bsnes/higan are in a whole different league, so your use case (running bsnes on an ancient Celeron) is more like to compete in a modern Formula 1 race with a 1993-spec Minardi - not a great car even back then, and a terrible car today. Licensed Pirate® since 2006, 100% Buttcoin™-free, enemy of All Things JavaScript™ |
| creaothceann |
Posted on 21-05-18, 18:53
|
|
Post: #337 of 456 Since: 10-29-18 Last post: 51 days Last view: 2 hours |
Posted by daman https://problemkaputt.de/gmb.htm My current setup: Super Famicom ("2/1/3" SNS-CPU-1CHIP-02) → SCART → OSSC → StarTech USB3HDCAP → AmaRecTV 3.10 |
| tomman |
Posted on 21-05-18, 19:47
|
|
Dinosaur
Post: #946 of 1318 Since: 10-30-18 Last post: 3 days Last view: 2 hours |
Posted by creaothceann Does nocash still sell license keys for that? Licensed Pirate® since 2006, 100% Buttcoin™-free, enemy of All Things JavaScript™ |
| creaothceann |
Posted on 21-05-18, 21:09
|
|
Post: #338 of 456 Since: 10-29-18 Last post: 51 days Last view: 2 hours |
Posted by tomman You'd have to ask him. My current setup: Super Famicom ("2/1/3" SNS-CPU-1CHIP-02) → SCART → OSSC → StarTech USB3HDCAP → AmaRecTV 3.10 |
| daman |
Posted on 21-05-19, 15:16
|
|
Post: #10 of 19 Since: 05-10-21 Last post: 1146 days Last view: 1134 days |
Thanks. |
| Nicholas Steel |
Posted on 21-05-23, 16:17 (revision 3)
|
|
Post: #396 of 426
Since: 10-30-18 Last post: 506 days Last view: 21 days |
I would very strongly recommend Snes9x, especially if the latest works in Windows 98. ZSNES is extremely bad and I know from personal experience of using it in Windows 9x in the 90's and early 2000's. If you insist on using ZSNES I'd suggest the MS-DOS version for performance (you can run it within Windows), just make sure to choose a 16bit graphics mode to get some semblance of transparency for transparency effects. v1.36 of ZSNES probably behaves the most *sensibly* so long as you're not playing any games that used special hardware like the SA1, C4 or SuperFX chips. AMD Ryzen 3700X | MSI Gamer Geforce 1070Ti 8GB | 16GB 3600MHz DDR4 RAM | ASUS Crosshair VIII Hero (WiFi) Motherboard | Windows 10 x64 |
| daman |
Posted on 21-05-27, 06:33
|
|
Post: #11 of 19 Since: 05-10-21 Last post: 1146 days Last view: 1134 days |
I didn't had any issues with zsnes. Which is the first version number of bsnes where SameBoy emulation for SGB & SGB2 is included? |
| Screwtape |
Posted on 21-05-27, 07:14
|
|
Full mod
Post: #435 of 443 Since: 10-30-18 Last post: 1108 days Last view: 179 days |
I think Sameboy was added for the bsnes reboot, which was... v106 or v107? The ending of the words is ALMSIVI. |
[Your ad here? Why not!]